Burn Hollywood Burn
When asked about ‘Realism’ in the movies, the writer Dorothy Parker famously replied “The only ‘ism’ Hollywood believes in is ‘Plagiarism’”
When asked about ‘Realism’ in the movies, the writer Dorothy Parker famously replied “The only ‘ism’ Hollywood believes in is ‘Plagiarism’”
Hiding all things
Queer in Hollywood has gone on since the first moving images were recorded. By
the time the 1933 Greta Garbo ‘Queen Christina’ movie about a lesbian monarch
was released, there was anything but a whiff of dykery to be seen. This was even
a full year before they would legally have to put the queer reins on with the
hysterically titled 1934 ‘Legion of Decency’ code. Eventually, a plethora of
other ‘issues’ were needed to mask Queer themes to keep them away from the
‘easily offended’. The problem became how to get around the ‘Homo problem’ and
still maintain a high level of drama and persecution.
In the movie Crossfire, they turned all the
queer-bashing and murder from the book into anti-Semitism. Same thing,
apparently. Same with ‘The Lost Weekend’ when Ray Milland morphed from a man
wrestling with his sexual identity, into that of a raging alcoholic - well, if
the glove fits… Thank goodness we live in more evolved times.
Isn’t it great
that we now have movies like ‘Milk’ and ‘Brokeback Mountain’ to finally weigh
up those old queer scores? Isn’t it groovy that the mainstream has finally
embraced Queer culture? And how swell it is when films like ‘Malcolm X’
fore-front issues of contemporary black identity and remind the world that the
struggle is far from over. And that ‘Shindlers’ List’ is actually an eternal
reminder of what happens when the hatred of a single race acquires a political
platform?
I actually think
that all these films should be part of an enforced global school curriculum to
keep all the haters and revisionists at bay. Unless there is ever going to be a
Gay Nation of Islam remake of Malcolm X, that is.
And I’m not saying
that boardroom Hollywood is homophobic. Not xenophobic, sexist, racist,
anti-Muslim either. But Hollywood has never been the pioneer of the underdog.
The saying goes that there is no ‘Pink’ dollar’ in Hollywood, and no ‘Black’
dollar either. In Hollywood there is only THE dollar, and whoever walks in the
door with it gets to stay. And when there is no money honey, there is no
Hollywood selling someone’s idea of freedom. And so Hollywood falls.
Since the Internet
has taken hold, Hollywood has become nothing more than a slow money grab - just
take a look at the garbage it churns out today. The only bonus being that,
since Hollywood no longer controls distribution, (hurrah to Netflix) other
narratives are free to spread. Great for us, sad for the executives who now
have to find someone else to fleece.
In the current
post-capitalist period, Hollywood has even more to get it just ‘right’ - the
right combination of sex, violence, ambiguity etc. so that they can get the
maximum audience into the cinema seats. The real prize is getting an audience
where grandpa takes grandson to the cinema – meaning that the product can be
sold to everyone in between. But increasingly, if any films don’t fill these
quadrants, i.e. have ‘minority subjects’ like Queers in them - then they just
don’t get financed. Unless Matt Damon agrees to star, that is. This is why
there’s so much shite at your local Multiplex and why Lucas and Spielberg have
been freaking out stating that; if a few more $200 million movies fold, then
it’ll be the end of $200 million dollar movies. Bring it on, I say.
But it’s not only
about the Dorothy Parker plagiarism issues and stealing of ideas - it’s also
the ‘normalizing’ of those ideas where the damage really lies. Let’s face it if
Hollywood could get away with turning Nelson Mandela white, they’d book
Leonardo DiCaprio in advance.
Even in its
demise, Hollywood is still viewed as being all about good ideas and a platform
for the people whose voices have been suppressed. Realistically any real trace
of this went away with the blacklist. And I’m not being hypothetical here. In addition, a colleagues serialized novel, ‘The man who,’ has
been withdrawn from this magazine for ongoing legal reasons. This ‘gay’ story
written ten years ago (and lifted five years later) has become the latest
chapter of heterosexualised Hollywood. Yes, the gay sperm donor and all the
complications surrounding him all those years ago, has now become not only
straight but indeed anal – if only to get more bums on seats. (Make your own
decision whether you prefer the ‘homosexual’ book or the ‘heterosexual’ film
later this year). But either way thank god it will be one of the last Hollywood
movies you’ll probably ever see. Besides the slated remake of ‘Lassie’ which
goes into production next year, that is.
When I say that
Hollywood has lost control of their distribution model to the internet, read it
as everyone else’s ‘artistic freedom’. It means any of us can make a movie that
has a chance of becoming a hit. And there are enough sassy, queer, off-Hollywood
films in production - Michael Urie’s ‘Such Good People’ springs to mind - to
keep us all going. So, as the studios struggle to keep up the heterosexual
front end, the queers are doing what we know best – using the back door. For
those at the top, it’s well and truly over because there’s finally a drive from
the ‘bottom up’ and sometimes, as we all know, that hurts like hell. So, let’s
welcome the new underdog movies that are surfacing, offering us all a different
‘Queer.’
To read the magazine version click the link below:
BURN HOLLYWOOD BURN. BAUER. GSCENE MAGAZINE. SEPTEMBER 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment